If the triangle was made with aromantic, homo- /heteroromantic it would work, but making it a rectangle with gender/disgender on one side won't really work. It implies that someone who's near the homoromantic side is closer to being "gender disregarder" than someone who's on the heteroromantic side, that's not necessarily true. It also implies someone on the heteroromantic side or gender disregarder side is closer to being aromantic than someone on the homoromantic side, that's not necessarily true either. So putting yourself in the chart will make implications that aren't valid.
I'd suggest taking inspiration from Darvince's triangle chart. I'm not sure what you mean by gender disregarder but if you mean biromantic it would make sense to place between homo and hetero, polyromantic or anything else one could argue would require a third axis, but it's a 2D chart and that limits the information you can make it convey.
In that case I'd be located probably here
Topic: What is your romantic orientation? (Read 2280 times)
