Requires Windows, Mac, or Linux
hmmm, looks kinda similar to original logo. also no gradient letters it has to be able to seen in black and white and as many backgrounds as possible. nice
I think you should put an 2 in the background of Saturn.Also they look awful! just kidding. 1st April i liked the last one
we don't want the same logo. if we did we wouldn't have to make a new one
Yes, the last one was the best. Gabriel said the 2 is very cliché, and he is right. It looks awful with a 2,IMO
I think a line through the rings would be good.
Cool. That blue is too bright, in my opinion. Make it darker and add some shadows just like in the logo at the top of the page
US2 Logo 20 looks the best to me, but perhaps a darker blue and shaded rings with stars in the background.
Quote from: Feldruam on April 02, 2014, 05:20:15 AMUS2 Logo 20 looks the best to me, but perhaps a darker blue and shaded rings with stars in the background.Is think kind of what you were talking about?
But it needs work. Maybe some shadow on the rings? And a Cassini division? And maybe not a star glow, just a four pointed sharp star, like thos lensflare kinds.
Or the rings thicker. Also the shadow shouldn't be gradient IMO
Quote from: bong on April 01, 2014, 04:11:44 PMhmmm, looks kinda similar to original logo. also no gradient letters it has to be able to seen in black and white and as many backgrounds as possible. nice Alright. I took out the gradient and placed it on a black background and white background to show its visibility.
Quote from: Xriqxa on April 02, 2014, 02:11:26 PMOr the rings thicker. Also the shadow shouldn't be gradient IMOWhich shadow? Rings or planet?
There we go! But a possible improvement would be to make the division thinner and the stars smaller and more plentiful.
No, I meant like more stars. And the size needs to be a little smaller. Great work. What program are you using? P.s. I am sorry if I am sounding bossy at the moment.