Post your config here !

[Vince77]

Hello everyone, I've created this thread because there is something I fear absolutely;
the performance of the game. The thing is I don't know if the game will run well on my computer.
The original US run at about 30 fps with 1 body in it but after more than 50 body, the game start to get to 10 fps, does the new US will run better or slower ?

[WitheHole18]

Unfortunately Slower,maybe because I have a prehistoric computer

[Vince77]

Can you post your config ?

[dechireur77]

You want my configuration?

[WitheHole18]

However US2 on my pc runs fast enough on a body 24 fps. Then it is slower because the details of the planets are very high and the orbital engine is much improved.

[Shriqua]

Hello everyone, I've created this thread because there is something I fear absolutely;
the performance of the game. The thing is I don't know if the game will run well on my computer.
The original US run at about 30 fps with 1 body in it but after more than 50 body, the game start to get to 10 fps, does the new US will run better or slower ?

uh oh. Maybe it's just running slow just that day (sometimes my computer had bad hairperformance days.) if not, maybe try refreshing your computer (turn on turn off).

Hopefully US2 will have better optimization in the near future.

[Vince77]

Now this topic will be dedicated to user configs.
Post your config here !!
Here mine :
   Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.140309-1509)
   System Manufacturer: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
   Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3217U CPU @ 1.80GHz (4 CPUs), ~1.8GHz
   Memory: 6144MB RAM
   Available OS Memory: 6030MB RAM
   DirectX Version: DirectX 11

[Pinkythefoxxywasp]

Sure, i'll list mine below V V V

OS: Windows 7 Home premium

GPU: Nvidia GTX 660 Ti

RAM: 8GB

CPU: Intel i5-3470  3.6 Ghz

HDD: 1 Terabyte

Quick edit, i forgot a few things: Triple monitor setup with 5280x1080 being the final Res.

- I mainly use this for gaming -

[spacegenius2000]

Here's my config:

OS: Windows 8.1 Pro
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
Processor: Intel Core i5
Hard Drive Space: 931 GB
RAM: 8 GB
Manufacturer: Dell
Computer type: Alienware X51 R2

Got this baby in Christmas 2013

[Vince77]

Also can you post your FPS in US² please ?

[Lord DC]

Config?


OS: Windows 8.1
Hard drive space: 1 Terrabyte
RAM: 8GB
CPU Cores: 8
Processor: Intel core i7 2.7 Ghertz
Manufacturer: ASUSTek
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
Cost: $1,500 USD

PS: the CPU is auto-overclocked to 150%

FPS in various games:
Minecraft: 500 FPS, measured without OptiFine installed and various large mods installed.
Universe Sandbox: 300 FPS in normal, 100 FPS in chaotic situations
TF2: 60 FPS with max players
GMod: 240 FPS

[Vince77]

Strange like you I have more than 400 fps in Minecraft (I have 53 mods installed), I wonder why I get just 20 fps in US...

[dechireur77]

Computer Type: Portable
Windows: 8.1 64-bit
Computer brand Asus: G75VW
16GB RAM (16384Mo): DDR3 "4 bars RAM 4096 MB"
Processor: Intel Core i7 3630QM@2.40 GHz (3.30 GHz booster) 4 heart
NVIDIA GTX660M GDDR5 [2047Mo available]
Resolution: "Screen format" [1600x900 @ 60Hz]
Capacity: 698 GB
Mouse: Logitech G300

[WitheHole18]

Here my:
Acer Aspire 5734Z
Intel@Pentium@processor T4500
Intel@GMA 4500M
Graphic card:Mobile Intel (R)4 series express Chipset family.
US2 fps:30-24 one body,2 50 body.
Unfortunately there is nothing else in my PC 

[kly108]

Here is my config.

http://pcpartpicker.com/p/KLDFbv
Everything is the same except the processor is overclocked to 4.3GHz

[SpyCreepers]

Amd athlon II X2 260
RAM 4GB
NVidia Geforce 8400GS
Windows 7 & Ubuntu
Fps : Windows = 12 fps ubuntu =  60 fps (cpu intergrator is wörking in ubuntu)

[wubbzy301]

OS - Windows 8.1 x64-bit
Video Card - Intel(R) HD Graphics
Sound Card - Intel(R) Display Audio
Sound Card 2 - Conexant SmartAudio HD

RAM - 4 GB
Processor - Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU ...0 @ 2.20GHz

Memory - 4096MB RAM
DirectX Version - DX11

CPU Speed - 2.2 GHz

Dedicated Video RAM - 32 MB
Pixel Shader - 4.1
Vex Shader - 4.1

Maximum Resolution - 1366 x 768

Java Version - 7.0.510

[Vince77]

I find out why I had low FPS on US1, I removed the labels and the trails and I set the ambient lighting to zero (more realistic lighting) and I got 100 fps with 300 bodies in the simulation.

[dechireur77]

I find out why I had low FPS on US1, I removed the labels and the trails and I set the ambient lighting to zero (more realistic lighting) and I got 100 fps with 300 bodies in the simulation.

Tu peux traduire en français ? j'ai pas compris la traduction Anglaise. (j'ai compris la moitié)

[PrimeMinisterTom]

I find out why I had low FPS on US1, I removed the labels and the trails and I set the ambient lighting to zero (more realistic lighting) and I got 100 fps with 300 bodies in the simulation.

Tu peux traduire en français ? j'ai pas compris la traduction Anglaise. (j'ai compris la moitié)

Il a mis ses étiquettes et s'estompe afin que UBox peut courir vite. (Désolés - je ne sais pas trop français )

[Vince77]

I find out why I had low FPS on US1, I removed the labels and the trails and I set the ambient lighting to zero (more realistic lighting) and I got 100 fps with 300 bodies in the simulation.

Tu peux traduire en français ? j'ai pas compris la traduction Anglaise. (j'ai compris la moitié)

J'ai trouvé comment augmenter le nombre de FPS sur US1, j'ai enlevé les traits laissé par les planètes j'ai mis ensuite la luminosité ambiante sur zéro. J'ai donc maintenant 100 fps avec 300 objets dans la simulation. Et finalement les labels ne change rien questions FPS. (N'est pas dans la traduction)

Il a mis ses étiquettes et s'estompe afin que UBox peut courir vite. (Désolés - je ne sais pas trop français )

Pas besoins de préciser, sa se voit  !

[dechireur77]

I find out why I had low FPS on US1, I removed the labels and the trails and I set the ambient lighting to zero (more realistic lighting) and I got 100 fps with 300 bodies in the simulation.

Tu peux traduire en français ? j'ai pas compris la traduction Anglaise. (j'ai compris la moitié)

J'ai trouvé comment augmenter le nombre de FPS sur US1, j'ai enlevé les traits laissé par les planètes j'ai mis ensuite la luminosité ambiante sur zéro. J'ai donc maintenant 100 fps avec 300 objets dans la simulation. Et finalement les labels ne change rien questions FPS.

Il a mis ses étiquettes et s'estompe afin que UBox peut courir vite. (Désolés - je ne sais pas trop français )

Pas besoins de préciser, sa se voit  !

Ah ok merci la je comprend mieux ^^
Oh oui ça se voit grave .. Thanks you Prime

[The Ventifact]

My rig:

- i7 3770
- GTX 770 SC
- 16GB RAM
- Asus Z77 Motherboard
- 27in 1080p Asus monitor
- Razer Deathadder 2013 mouse
- Razer Blackwidow 2013 mechanical backlit keyboard

Best PC I've ever owned. :D You could call it my multimedia workstation and gaming machine.

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '129746'.

[Jim Jam Science Mans]

i7 4770K @ 3.5GHz
32gb RAM
GTX Titan
8TB HDD.

No clue yet on my US2 frame rate, but I think it's safe to say that if I tank on a sim, everyone else will too. The Titan, while an underwhelming graphics card from its pricepoint, is a beast processing wise for this sort of thing.

[The Ventifact]

i7 4770K @ 3.5GHz
32gb RAM
GTX Titan
8TB HDD.

No clue yet on my US2 frame rate, but I think it's safe to say that if I tank on a sim, everyone else will too. The Titan, while an underwhelming graphics card from its pricepoint, is a beast processing wise for this sort of thing.

I don't think the Titan is underwhelming in a price point of view. It's a 1,000 bucks for a reason. A 780 TI comes close, which is more competitive I guess, because most people will look for the better price vs performance comparison.

The Titan has 2688 CUDA cores, that's a lot of shaders for processing. And that 6 GB VRAM isn't just there for show either. You should be sitting pretty with that GPU, as this next iteration of Universe Sandbox looks like it will have better performance. We'll all find out soon enough.

[Jim Jam Science Mans]

No, it really is underwhelming from a purely graphical perspective. It's that additional brute force that can only come into play for other things that makes it worthwhile. To put it simply, it's not really a gamer's card (you can get somewhat better performance at a lower cost if you want), but it is a good card for all kinds of other intensive nonsense - which makes it ideal for this for sort of thing.

[Sebekpolak51]

And here's mine:

Win7 64-bit Home Premium
6,000 GB RAM

Processor:

Intel(R) Core (TM) i3 CPU
2.53 GHz

IntelHDGraphics 4000 or 6000 (I don't remember, I even don't know like a noob)
4 processors.

Edit: Nobody Cares 

[The Ventifact]

No, it really is underwhelming from a purely graphical perspective. It's that additional brute force that can only come into play for other things that makes it worthwhile. To put it simply, it's not really a gamer's card (you can get somewhat better performance at a lower cost if you want), but it is a good card for all kinds of other intensive nonsense - which makes it ideal for this for sort of thing.

The Titan bridges the gap between gaming and multimedia. Video editing, 3D rendering, and photo processing must be a lot of fun with that card. :)

[RobertGimRo]

Iam The Single One With These Config

OS Windows 7 Profesional

Gpu:Nvidia GeForce 210

CPU Amd Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Prossesor 4600

RAM 2GB