Men talk more than women

[Darvince]

Women's speech is criticized more thoroughly than men's.

[Gordon Freeman]

and in the end no one cares.

[Darvince]

people should care because it results from

Women's speech is criticized more thoroughly than men's.

[Gordon Freeman]

chauvinist pigs oppress women for not being men, not because they "talk more"

what does your personal text mean

why is that relevant
why not just pm me

[Darvince]

>as if there's two special groups of men, one oppressive, the other not

[Gordon Freeman]

Yes.

[Darvince]

oh that makes sense, you've enlightened me so much zirkza. i've never thought that people didn't have varying degrees of misogyny and just simply either hate women or love women.

[Gordon Freeman]

I didn't say there aren't subgroups and, like you said, degrees.

Meanwhile I can't see why people judge minds instead of bodies.

Related:
http://youtu.be/PShA2q0NgiY

[Darvince]

how is that related

[vh]

is this post sarcastic

[Darvince]

Meanwhile I can't see why people judge minds instead of bodies.

?? what the hell

[vh]

because the mind is the seat of the soul

[vh]

Women's speech is criticized more thoroughly than men's.

debatable

and in the end no one cares.

clearly darvince did, that's why he made this topic

>as if there's two special groups of men, one oppressive, the other not

it'd be a fuzzy grouping. but then again, anything can be grouped. how do you group the points that make up a line? the split is arbitrary

[Darvince]

that last post you responded to was sarcasm

sourcey http://www.livescience.com/7420-men-talk-women.html (and yes I read more than just the headline, the article agrees with the title unlike a lot of clickbait)

[Gordon Freeman]

how is that related

Cutting is a result of superficial judgment.

is this post sarcastic

No.

Meanwhile I can't see why people judge minds instead of bodies.

??what the hell

"The boobs don't make the woman"
      -Onision

and in the end no one cares.

clearly darvince did, that's why he made this topic

But it's never been a political issue, and most likely never will be.

it'd be a fuzzy grouping. but then again, anything can be grouped. how do you group the points that make up a line? the split is arbitrary

Think of the Sexuality Triangle. There is no specific spilt; it's a gradient.

[Darvince]

no it's a line you can't "not care about women" unless you're isolated in some all-male habitat

[Gordon Freeman]

That's like saying

no it's a line you can't "not care about god" unless you're isolated in some all-atheist habitat

[Darvince]

Those two are extremely different. God is not present in our day-to-day lives (unless you want him/it to be), whereas women are.