Post your scores brahs

[Cosmos]

http://slackhalla.org/~demise/test/socialattitude.php

Progressivism: 87.5
Socialism: 37.5
Tenderness: 46.875

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a uncompromising realistic egalitarian with few strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

[Lord DC]

Social Attitude Test


Political Values

Progressivism    77.5
Socialism    68.75
Tenderness    31.25

Your test scores indicate that you are a tough-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are distrustful towards religion, and have an indifferent and uncompassionate attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible radical egalitarian with many strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

[SpyCreepers]

Political Values

Progressivism   52.5
Socialism   50
Tenderness   43.75

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded cultural centrist; this is the political profile one might associate with a jaded materialist. It appears that you are tolerant towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a progressive.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate realistic centrist with few strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '129430'.

[matty406]

Progressivism    97.5
Socialism    93.75
Tenderness    50

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a cultural marxist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate idealistic egalitarian with many strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

I don't consider myself much of a communist and this is the first time something's labelled me as such. Although looking into the 'cultural marxist' I think I can identify with that term in several ways.

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '129432'.

[matty406]

« Reply #3 on: Today at 12:05:39 PM »
« Reply #4 on: Today at 12:05:44 PM »

gj matty

gj fiah you broke quotes.

[Pinkythefoxxywasp]

Political Values

Progressivism   75
Socialism   68.75
Tenderness   46.875

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible principled centrist with many strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

[Bla]

Progressivism   85
Socialism   100
Tenderness   50

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a cultural marxist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a uncompromising idealistic egalitarian with an established worldview.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

Should we merge the topic with this?
http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php/topic,4798.0.html

[Cosmos]

I don't think so. This isn't a purely political test.

[Lovechild]

Progressivism   97.5
Socialism   100
Tenderness   50

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a kind-hearted principled egalitarian with a firmly established worldview.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

[atomic7732]

Progressivism   77.5
Socialism   100
Tenderness   50

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate realistic egalitarian with many strong convictions.

[TheMooCows]

Why is everyone a journalist according to this.

[TheMooCows]

Political Values

Progressivism   85
Socialism   87.5
Tenderness   59.375

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a balanced attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a sensible idealistic egalitarian with few strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.



Yay not a journalist

[Darvince]

What the soul this test thinks I am of more extremist than Bla

Progressivism    100
Socialism          100
Tenderness       50

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a journalist. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a kind-hearted principled egalitarian with an established worldview.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '129484'.

[Cosmos]

How, am I the only capitalist here?

[Darvince]

yes you capitalismcapital

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '129493'.

[matty406]

I'm a little capitalist i guess but I'm like "reforms reforms regulate everything"

[Lovechild]

How, am I the only capitalist here?

I think people who would be interested in something like Universe Sandbox would skew towards "educated" (not necessarily graduates or whatever but certainly more "learned" people), and that probably correlates to a higher skepticism of capitalism. and then there's the fact that if you live in a capitalist society (and uhh everyone does in the 21st century), you've probably been pretty screwed over by it. doesn't take much to question this universal capitalist orthodoxy.

me personally, I believe capitalism is a good thing for developing nations. if put in place properly (i.e. with enough regulation to protect workers but not scare off multinationals), capitalism in those countries could lead to a rapid expansion of prosperity. it's in the first world where it starts to become problematic.

look at the post-war era in the United States, for example: the 1945-1975 period was one of escalating prosperity across the board. following around the middle of the 1970s, income started to concentrate at the top and stagnated everywhere else. unions went into decline as the right-wing waged war on them, and with them went worker protections and regulations. now we have 150 million people who qualify as either in poverty or on the brink of poverty.

a lot of us probably would think the kind of post-war capitalism, a Keynesian variety, would be okay if somehow you could prevent the extremely wealthy from using that wealth to buy off the system. but you can't. as long as there is a person (or a few people) on top of corporate pyramids, capitalism will always be perverted into something that works against the people. that's why there have been periodic resets here in the USA, most notably the New Deal.

it's not as if socialistic ideas have been perfect or anything, it's just a matter of perspective. some people are okay with the wealthy increasing their share of everything until everybody else has next to nothing. some people really hate that idea. most people are somewhere in the middle.

either there are no good answers or we haven't looked in the right place, but if there are no good answers, we on the left believe we (humanity) can still do better than this. maybe we're wrong, but we've gotta try. a utopia may be impossible but that doesn't mean we have to fall into a dystopia.

/rant