Wikipedia

[blotz]

tell why you think it is

a lot of teachers say "no wikipedia" and "anyone can change it"
but it is properly staffed, so isn't it like trustable??

[ShadowScal3d]

Ehhh. Wikipedia isn't exactly the most trustable source on the internet. But this is the internet we're talking about here XD
And if it is staffed then that would be good, because it would be more trustable, like you said
I need to be more relaxed in EE, don't I?

[vh]

it's on par with britannica in terms of accuracy apparently

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '102880'.

[atomic7732]

And if it is staffed then that would be good, because it would be more trustable, like you said

it's not an anarchy no

It's kind of funny how serious they are about what goes on the articles...

And if you make a false edit someone will have noticed/reverted it within 5 minutes.

[Bla]

Some articles are trustable and some aren't, but if you want to find out whether they're trustable you'll usually need to check their sources.
I don't use Wikipedia as a source, but like Fiah said, the articles often have many sources you could use. I use it to get an overview of things, find sources and expand vocabulary on an area so it becomes easier to search for.

[Hellpotatoe]

I need to be more relaxed in EE, don't I?

Yis yu shuld cuse none here is sirius.


Only Bla, maybe Yqt and Naru, but they're exceptshuns

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '102898'.

[Hellpotatoe]

Hey, I'm serious 51% of the time. . .

Fiah doesnt count

[matty406]

It is trustable, usually only the obscure articles have little credibility because they're mostly built from the writer's own knowlege. Not to say that the knowlege could be wrong, just that there's nothing to back it up with.

On that note, I present to you my favourite piece of obscure vandalism on Wikipedia.

[Darvince]

brittanica on average has 2.6 errors per article
wikipedia on average has 3.5 errors per article

additionally, wikipedia's articles are usually longer

[Bla]

brittanica on average has 2.6 errors per article
wikipedia on average has 3.5 errors per article

additionally, wikipedia's articles are usually longer

[Citation needed]?

[Darvince]

sorry bla it was an article about factuality of encyclopedias and i don't have the exact URL at this moment because it was about two months ago i am so terribly sorry

EDIT: GRR!!!

[atomic7732]

I think it was a joke partially

[vh]

^[citation needed]

[atomic7732]

^{[citation needed]}