Author Topic: Universe Sandbox Forum non-world map topic. (Read 204861 times)

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #570 on:** August 31, 2012, 08:28:50 AM »

Height ~~Sagua~~ Map

Climate/Vegetation

FiahOwl · « **Reply #571 on:** August 31, 2012, 08:32:20 AM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '79773'.

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #572 on:** August 31, 2012, 08:41:46 AM »

Well, the north of it already have a nation.
Fractal Terrains, proBLAbly

Darvince · « **Reply #573 on:** August 31, 2012, 08:58:44 AM »

i can tell that he used fractal terrains
and why can't we just have our own more realistic continents

bye elevation realism

bye climate realism

bye realism

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #574 on:** August 31, 2012, 09:01:23 AM »

Darvince · « **Reply #575 on:** August 31, 2012, 02:18:19 PM »

in case you never noticed, irl continents aren't just most massif slopes

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #576 on:** September 01, 2012, 02:43:38 AM »

The method used here is strange. Is better create the world first, and let the people claim land.

Darvince · « **Reply #577 on:** September 01, 2012, 08:16:39 AM »

what the pony are you talking about

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #578 on:** September 01, 2012, 10:06:45 AM »

Quote from: Hellpotatoe on September 01, 2012, 02:43:38 AM

The method used here is strange. Is better create the world first, and let the people claim land.

We create our nations/lands/kontinents randomly in the map.
Its better create the kontinents first and put our nations on them after.

Bla · « **Reply #579 on:** September 01, 2012, 10:18:18 AM »

But if we've already decided how our nations should look? Blaist Blaland can change (because I sort of want to edit it myself), but I don't really want to do Redbow again, the Darversion was good and I've made a "complex" map with it already.

Darvince · « **Reply #580 on:** September 01, 2012, 10:42:08 AM »

i've decided all kinds of history for himalia, and i can't exactly rename everything and redo everything to fit an unrealistic map

Naru523 · « **Reply #581 on:** September 01, 2012, 01:01:20 PM »

^ this

atomic7732 · « **Reply #582 on:** September 01, 2012, 01:11:42 PM »

The last three posts.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #583 on:** September 01, 2012, 05:56:25 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '79910'.

vh · « **Reply #584 on:** September 01, 2012, 08:49:04 PM »

can we start with a blank 4k by 4k .png (or any similar dimension).

Darvince · « **Reply #585 on:** September 01, 2012, 09:46:42 PM »

that would be a torus

vh · « **Reply #586 on:** September 01, 2012, 09:49:50 PM »

what about a 4k pixel square.

Darvince · « **Reply #587 on:** September 01, 2012, 09:50:42 PM »

this is the most recent map @ mudkipz, just find space for kallisto:
http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7069.0;attach=17780;image

vh · « **Reply #588 on:** September 01, 2012, 09:54:53 PM »

ok.

does anyone want to volunteer as the landmass i can stick kallisto onto (it'll be small)

also whats the scale for the map.

Darvince · « **Reply #589 on:** September 01, 2012, 09:56:12 PM »

NO MUDKIPZ WE ARE NOT USING STRICT NS STATISTICS
decrease the population from 3.852 trillion or w/e to something reasonable

vh · « **Reply #590 on:** September 01, 2012, 09:59:09 PM »

i thought we weren't doing population at all in this map. just forget i said anything about population density and teeel me the scale.

Darvince · « **Reply #591 on:** September 02, 2012, 12:02:47 AM »

49km^2 = 1 px

(pixel is two-dimensional)
population is decided by what the majority thinks is reasonable, and since i'm pretty sure bla, nue, nar, and fiah as well as me think 3.85 trillion people is unreasonable, it will be rejected

Darvince · « **Reply #592 on:** September 02, 2012, 12:21:31 AM »

finally finished himalian rivers map >.<

vh · « **Reply #593 on:** September 02, 2012, 12:36:47 AM »

Quote from: Darvince on September 02, 2012, 12:02:47 AM

49km^2 = 1 px

(pixel is two-dimensional)
population is decided by what the majority thinks is reasonable, and since i'm pretty sure bla, nue, nar, and fiah as well as me think 3.85 trillion people is unreasonable, it will be rejected

7kms for the length of a pixel is strange, but whatever.

i never said kallisto has anything near 3.85 trillion people. didn't we agree to leave the population thingy out of this map?

Darvince · « **Reply #594 on:** September 02, 2012, 12:42:21 AM »

we agreed to not use NS statistics other than the nation names
we never agreed for the world to be void of intelligent life aka no population

vh · « **Reply #595 on:** September 02, 2012, 12:46:51 AM »

me=/=we apparently.

i never said 'we' agreed for the world to have no population. but it is not needed to discuss population when drawing a map. usually.

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #596 on:** September 02, 2012, 03:52:59 AM »

Quote from: Darvince on September 01, 2012, 10:42:08 AM

i've decided all kinds of history for himalia, and i can't exactly rename everything and redo everything to fit an unrealistic map

The original map is sorta of unrealistic, someone sayed.
And why rename everything?
But okay, no changes.
But i will change Issamoria a lot, proBLAbly.
In a near future, maybe.

vh · « **Reply #597 on:** September 02, 2012, 06:47:42 AM »

added kallisto.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #598 on:** September 02, 2012, 07:19:32 AM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '79989'.

Hellpotatoe · « **Reply #599 on:** September 02, 2012, 07:21:13 AM »

Quote from: FiahOwl on September 02, 2012, 07:19:32 AM

loool

This is a strange way to say bump.

Poll

mom

Author Topic: Universe Sandbox Forum non-world map topic. (Read 204861 times)