I wish I had been viewing this forum when this thread started so all this crap would have not built up. The atheists have made a rather long run at it without any rebuttals. I'll see how much time I am willing to use up here.
I am waiting in excitement to see what this crap is.
Starting with the whole 6 days of creation versus billions of years:
Theists wanting to be informed can go to this website and read, since I don't have the time nor could I do a better job at explaining it. What you will learn on this website was BEFORE Darwin and was the common thought on the matter.
http://www.kjvbible.org/
All the Christianphobic people, i.e. militant atheists should read it as well so that they would stop using arguments based on ignorance....but my experience shows it probably won't occur.
Can you show me one argument from ignorance made by a "militant atheist" in this thread?
I'm not Christianophobic. I know well that Christians are just as different from each other as any other group of people. But I do have some pretty big problems with Christianity. Critizising a religion is
not the same as critizising the people.
If you find it offensive that I critizise The Bible, I can tell you that I think The Bible is very offensive as well.
Science remains at a loss to definitively explain the Ice Age and the anomaly of the mysterious mega fauna extinctions across the face of the Earth about 12,000 to 10,000 Radio Carbon years ago.
Where have I heard this before... It reminds me of the Faux News-Bill O'Reilly "Science can't explain it, therefore goddidit!" argument, which is ridiculous. That is really just the god of the gaps.
Geologic evidence from that period indicates extraordinary global massive volcanism, gigantic tidal waves, seismic activity on a vast scale, and extreme temperature swings on the Earth over a geologically brief period of time. It is no coincidence that the Bible at Genesis 1:2 describes the Earth as flooded, desolate, and in darkness in the timeframe closely corresponding to these catastrophic events in the Earth's natural history. Clearly, these two mysteries are linked.
Please show me what evidence there is, I don't see any reason to blindly trust this site, and I have other things to do than jumping around the internet to find evidence for claims I didn't make.
I'm just wondering why it doesn't link to any scientific sources at all... I clicked the Geology Resources link, but I don't know if it's a joke linking to the latest seismic data. It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the rest. Is it just so that we can see how angry God is at all the innocent people living around the globe, maybe?
Another thing is that the site just uses
adjectives to describe what happens. Notice that it doesn't actually make any solid claims about the period of time it describes, except from being different from the current Earth in some ways (volcanic activity and the other things it mentioned).
And it still denies all the evidence for the vast majority of the history of life, which is much more than a few thousand years. "What you will learn on this website was BEFORE Darwin and was the common thought on the matter." - Without knowing what reason to think this narrow interpretation of The Bible, among the vast ocean of different interpretations (which might show something about the vagueness of the book?) was what MOST people thought before Darwin, I'll just say that it is the equivilant to what was thought BEFORE we learned that The Earth was a sphere, and not flat, or BEFORE we learned that diseases are caused by mikroorganisms and parasites, and not demons.
"Young life creationism" is almost as absurd as young Earth creationism. Accepting the evidence for Earth's 4.5 billion years old history doesn't make it the slightest less absurd to reject the evidence for the vast majority of the history of life.
And it raises another question: Why would a god make a universe run for
13.7 billion years before creating life in it?