My Number Is Bigger!

[Darvince]

ok it's on now

TREE(TREE(3))

[atomic7732]

t^oooo_{ooo f}a^aast

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

ok it's on now

TREE(TREE(3))

TREE(TREE(^{1010101010100}))
AKA TREE(TREE(Googolquinplex))

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

t^{oo f}a_st

NOT A NUMBER

[atomic7732]

TREE(TREE(g63))

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

TREE(TREE(g63))

TREE(TREE(TREE(10^{10101010101010101010100})))

[atomic7732]

TREE(TREE(TREE(10↑↑↑10)))

[Darvince]

let us define XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(x,y) as x number of nested TREE(TREE(TREE...(y)))

XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(10,3)

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

let us define XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(x,y) as x number of nested TREE(TREE(TREE...(y)))

XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(10,3)

XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(10¹⁰¹⁰⁰,3),XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(10¹⁰¹⁰⁰,3))

AKA Number of Softlocks Paper Mario Has/NoSPMH

[FiahOwl]

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '186003'.

[Austritistanian]

TREE(א!)

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

TREE(א!)

TOO SMALL

[JMBuilder]

2

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

2

TOO SMALL

[JMBuilder]

2

TOO SMALL

Depends on the scale of which it refers to and the time dilation within its vicinity, as well as the number of applicable dimensions and the concept of multiple histories within the multiverse and the resulting paradoxes that science has yet to explain or even properly conceptualize in a way that humans can perceive without leaving out significant variables that would affect the final outcome or outcomes based on whether or not there is more than one dimension of time as well as whether those dimensions are comparable to lines or rays.

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

let us define World 1-1(x,y) as x number of nested XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO...(y)))


World 1-1(100,10^1010100)

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

2

TOO SMALL

Depends on the scale of which it refers to and the time dilation within its vicinity, as well as the number of applicable dimensions and the concept of multiple histories within the multiverse and the resulting paradoxes that science has yet to explain or even properly conceptualize in a way that humans can perceive without leaving out significant variables that would affect the final outcome or outcomes based on whether or not there is more than one dimension of time as well as whether those dimensions are comparable to lines or rays.

And at the scale we are on, its insignificant.

[JMBuilder]

According to what perception?

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

2

TOO SMALL

Depends on the scale of which it refers to and the time dilation within its vicinity, as well as the number of applicable dimensions and the concept of multiple histories within the multiverse and the resulting paradoxes that science has yet to explain or even properly conceptualize in a way that humans can perceive without leaving out significant variables that would affect the final outcome or outcomes based on whether or not there is more than one dimension of time as well as whether those dimensions are comparable to lines or rays.

And at the scale we are on, its insignificant.

According to what perception?

This thread's perception.

[JMBuilder]

Which one?

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

Which one?

JUST LOOK AT THE NUMBERS

[JMBuilder]

Relative to what?

[Gurren Lagann TSS]

Relative to what?

Numbers like World 1-1(100,10^1010100), where 100 is the number of nested XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO...(10^1010100))), whereXKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO is:

let us define XKCLASSENDOFTHEWORLDSCENARIO(x,y) as x number of nested TREE(TREE(TREE...(y)))

[JMBuilder]

We talkin' space, isospace, subspace, or hyperspace? How about time; 1D, 2D?

And how about the bending of light?

[atomic7732]

what does that have to do with numbers

3 > 2 no matter how gravity warps spacetime or how many dimensions we're talking about... it just doesn't make sense

[JMBuilder]

Why not?

/8^3

[Darvince]

numbers don't exist in this universe, they do in a sense exist though, but not in any way that it's coherent to talk about physics acting on numbers, 2 doesn't become 3 near a black hole because it doesn't have any properties other than being a mathematical object

like you can talk about a space being 2 dimensional or 3 dimensional, and that's coherent, but if at the first instant after the universe began it was 2 dimensional and shortly after became 3 dimensional, for example, that doesn't mean that 2 became 3, it means that a property of the universe changed.

The way this thread exists is that it exists on computer screens which consist of pixels which consist of three tiny lights of red, blue, and green, which consist of excited atoms; as bits in one or two different servers as well as computers which are flipped transistors consisting of atoms; and as visual experiences in consciousness which are ????, which are all in this universe. None of these are numerical, even though I used several different numbers in this paragraph, namely "1", "2", and "3". They are patterns of pixels which enter your consciousness and only then become numbers through the magic of consciousness. However the numbers as themselves aren't dependent on anyone's consciousness or any position or time in the universe to exist, and will always be what they are.

[Naru523]

1

[atomic7732]

Integer.MAX_VALUE + 1

[JMBuilder]

Numbers are merely a medium of exchange between observation and interpretation.