Author Topic: USF Activity Science (Read 42499 times)

Darvince · « **Reply #60 on:** January 08, 2017, 11:35:19 PM »

oh kol yes best model

we will shitpost our way to infinity

Darvince · « **Reply #61 on:** January 14, 2017, 04:26:42 PM »

Update for the forecast to 20170105 (for finished activity levels), and five days of the forecast busting too high!

vh · « **Reply #62 on:** January 15, 2017, 05:38:57 AM »

wow those shitposts didn't show up at all

Darvince · « **Reply #63 on:** January 15, 2017, 09:14:53 PM »

ikr we must schitpost at an astounding rate to achieve our goals

FiahOwl · « **Reply #64 on:** January 26, 2017, 07:39:15 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '178509'.

Darvince · « **Reply #65 on:** January 26, 2017, 07:41:02 PM »

idk i gotta update the schit to see how the forcecast has performed

FiahOwl · « **Reply #66 on:** January 26, 2017, 07:42:27 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '178521'.

Darvince · « **Reply #67 on:** January 26, 2017, 07:58:04 PM »

new forcecast with the death of usf predicted

atomic7732 · « **Reply #68 on:** January 26, 2017, 08:35:43 PM »

i would guess that coincides with the death of functioning internet structure in the US or maybe the world or maybe just ~~science~~ reality gets banned

Darvince · « **Reply #69 on:** March 17, 2017, 02:34:29 AM »

2017-03-16 wat

FiahOwl · « **Reply #70 on:** March 17, 2017, 07:22:18 AM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '179794'.

Darvince · « **Reply #71 on:** July 09, 2017, 05:16:51 AM »

Updated.

Darvince · « **Reply #72 on:** March 10, 2018, 02:35:25 AM »

i'm not going to do this anymore because the levels of daily spam are ridiculous

Gurren Lagann TSS · « **Reply #73 on:** March 10, 2018, 12:32:07 PM »

Quote from: Darvince on March 10, 2018, 02:35:25 AM

i'm not going to do this anymore because the levels of daily spam are ridiculous

True. LIKE 100 MILLION SPAM EVERYDAY

Darvince · « **Reply #74 on:** December 29, 2018, 12:46:51 AM »

I decided to update it for the first time since July 2017 (!) The solution I used to remove the spam signal was to not count new topics as posts in the curated charts from November 16, 2017 (that day had more topics created than any day since January 2, 2017) until September 4, 2018, when the spambots ended by grace of an admin making new accounts have to be approved to post. Previously the curated charts were just without CTAM, but now exclude the massive spam wave from this year as well.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IpQsKX3K6WgZ5slwydnG4_tR08zdOOX_naFxHVavrAs/edit#gid=1289847942

Darvince · « **Reply #75 on:** December 29, 2018, 12:50:58 AM »

also bong told me to move the data off of google sheets and use r or matplotlib

Darvince · « **Reply #76 on:** December 29, 2018, 12:53:33 AM »

Darvince · « **Reply #77 on:** July 05, 2019, 02:00:59 AM »

A wave of spambots or just regular bots are visiting the forum every day and this wave has set new record highs for the maximum number of viewers online at the same time twice in the last week - the first time on June 30th and the second time yesterday on July 4th. More details forthcoming.

vh · « **Reply #78 on:** July 05, 2019, 01:07:13 PM »

this confirms my intution that 2012 was peak usf

atomic7732 · « **Reply #79 on:** July 05, 2019, 01:13:50 PM »

what was the previous peak that held for the longest time

Darvince · « **Reply #80 on:** July 05, 2019, 02:14:05 PM »

366 from july 2011

it held until december 2018 when this started happening

Darvince · « **Reply #81 on:** October 10, 2019, 08:20:06 PM »

Updated the sheet to 2019-10-09

Darvince · « **Reply #82 on:** October 28, 2019, 06:42:55 AM »

Updated the sheet to 2019-10-27

I don't know if I should keep not counting CTAM in the posts since in the current edition of Active CTAM almost every CTAM post has actual content with it rather than just being the number. Thoughts?

Lord DC · « **Reply #83 on:** October 28, 2019, 06:49:28 AM »

dew it

atomic7732 · « **Reply #84 on:** October 28, 2019, 07:37:14 AM »

idk i'd be consistent or it might become a mess real fast

Darvince · « **Reply #85 on:** November 23, 2019, 05:07:14 PM »

thank you deoxcy

red = without ctam
blue = with ctam

Darvince · « **Reply #86 on:** November 23, 2019, 05:22:20 PM »

The measure of moving average posts per topic (which considers the previous and next 15 days from the date it calculates) had a new record high on 2019-10-31 at 45.37 posts per new topic created.

deoxy99 · « **Reply #87 on:** November 23, 2019, 09:56:15 PM »

Quote from: Darvince on November 23, 2019, 05:07:14 PM

thank you deoxcy

and thank you for stroking my ~~dick~~ ego

Lord DC · « **Reply #88 on:** November 23, 2019, 10:20:06 PM »

texas

Darvince · « **Reply #89 on:** May 30, 2020, 10:09:00 PM »

the average posts per topic plummeted to 4.13 from around 15 because of the immense amounts of spam on the forum in 2017 and '18, and has been recovering since then, but due to the relatively low activity of the forum, has only risen by 0.09 to 4.22 today