11.3 performance is amazing(for me)

[valentin123]

having 70 score on the performance test

[WitheHole18]

for me 3...

[DaniheltheMage]

106.68

Aw yeah

[nosirrbro]

I got 50.

[Hati Hroovitnisson]

nehhhhh 76

[Unnamed25]

48.54(i blame galaxy collision part)

how much ram do you guys have?

[pac0master]

I've got a performance test of 55.

[valentin123]

48.54(i blame galaxy collision part)
I have 12 GB
how much ram do you guys have?

[The Ventifact]

48.54(i blame galaxy collision part)

how much ram do you guys have?

I've got 16GB in my rig. Also, I got a 67.83 as my score. I thought it would have been a little higher, like in the 80's, as I have a GTX 770, but I guess not. :/

Then again, the GPU I have aims to be very efficient and consistent in what it does, not aim for the highest score (for being 400 dollars, you think it would). Well, I guess this goes to show that Giant Army still have some optimization to take care of.

[DaniheltheMage]

I've got 32 gigs of ram(ithink)

[Electrodynamix]

149.59   

[DaniheltheMage]

woah, nice

[spa_sapping]

My reaction when i get a score of 18

[The_Fool]

I'm getting a performance test score of 151 when using my CPU for the physics.  It goes down to 104 when using one of my graphics cards, and they are good cards.  After looking at the utilization, it seems that the graphics cards are very underutilized, even when set to calculate the physics.  The usage on one card sits at 0% and the other averages 15% usage.  I turned vertical sync off.  I have the Intel Core i7 5930K with Hyperthreading off, and my graphics cards are two Radeon HD 7950s in Crossfire.

Even though this application doesn't seem to take advantage of Crossfire, I should be able to dedicate one card for the graphics and one card for the physics.  The CPU seems to calculate the physics better, though.