Author Topic: Tournament (Active USForums members) (Read 23973 times)

FiahOwl · « **Reply #90 on:** February 01, 2012, 03:50:05 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57486'.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #91 on:** February 01, 2012, 03:52:06 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57487'.

Darvince · « **Reply #92 on:** February 01, 2012, 03:53:44 PM »

Mudkipz, hurricanes thrive off of low wind shear, high sea surface temperatures, and a high pressure above it. A nuke in the eye would only strengthen the system, while a nuke in the eye wall would weaken it slightly.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #93 on:** February 01, 2012, 03:58:25 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57489'.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #94 on:** February 01, 2012, 03:59:37 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57490'.

Darvince · « **Reply #95 on:** February 01, 2012, 04:11:07 PM »

Uhhh, what?
You don't know our personalities, do you?

vh · « **Reply #96 on:** February 01, 2012, 04:11:12 PM »

Quote from: FiahOwl on February 01, 2012, 03:50:05 PM

Quote from: mudkipz on February 01, 2012, 03:48:05 PM
no, if you evaporate the convection columns the whole hurrican falls apart

How the hell would you change the pressure of the earths atmosphere

Quote
also you can claim "different analogy" or "different point" etc to practically anything....

Different Scale, Then.

You don't change the pressure
you evaporate everything.

vh · « **Reply #97 on:** February 01, 2012, 04:13:20 PM »

i made a new thread. so we can stop derailing this one about storms and nukes

FiahOwl · « **Reply #98 on:** February 01, 2012, 04:14:50 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57497'.

vh · « **Reply #99 on:** February 01, 2012, 04:15:58 PM »

bring it to the other thread. ./stop derail

and you're to obsessed with creating pressure

atomic7732 · « **Reply #100 on:** February 01, 2012, 04:32:02 PM »

I don't think a new thread was really needed, considering we're kind of basing who wins on this discussion, but okay. I guess it works.

smjjames · « **Reply #101 on:** February 01, 2012, 05:06:36 PM »

Quote from: bong on February 01, 2012, 03:27:55 PM

its time for the tables to turn

an explosion could always blow up a storm. imagine the sun blowing up vs a tiny hurrican

The Sun blows up, the Earth dies, the end...

smjjames · « **Reply #102 on:** February 01, 2012, 05:07:49 PM »

Quote from: FiahOwl on February 01, 2012, 04:14:50 PM

BUT HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU GOING TO GET LOTS OF PRESSURE INTO A LOW PRESSURE SPOT THAT'S HUNDREDS OF FUCKING KILOMETERS WIDE?!?!

Exactly. Short of almost blowing up the planet.

AAAND, I'm the tiebreaker as usual.

Quote from: phinehas on February 01, 2012, 05:04:05 PM

Quote from: Darvince on February 01, 2012, 04:11:07 PM
Uhhh, what?
You don't know our personalities, do you?

From what I have read, I can't tell what the basis for making a determination of the winner is...it's only apparent that it isn't based on anything rational....so if I pick a winner based on a screen name, who's to say that isn't valid, considering again, what thing that begins with mud trumps anything that begins with atomic? Atomic bomb > mudpie. atomic wins.

To your point, I think all the personalities, except me and Dan, are in a contest to see who can make the least amount of sense for the longest period of time....so quite frankly, understanding your personalities isn't on my to do list.

Pfft, mudkipz has won that already.

Also, there is plenty of sense to go around....

smjjames · « **Reply #103 on:** February 01, 2012, 06:21:00 PM »

Quote from: phinehas on February 01, 2012, 05:36:21 PM

Quote
Pfft, mudkipz has won that already.

Since when is a tie a win. phinehas voted for atomic7732...somebody register a new user stat.

I meant the 'contest to see who can make the least amount of sense for the longest period of time' part.

vh · « **Reply #104 on:** February 01, 2012, 06:22:56 PM »

what speak you of this blasphemous sense....sounds a bit...should i say....Derivative

vh · « **Reply #105 on:** February 01, 2012, 06:24:14 PM »

also even how fist fighting has transgified into disrupting nuestorms with blanormous amounts of energies evn matty shall not! know!

Darvince · « **Reply #106 on:** February 01, 2012, 08:45:19 PM »

Goddamnit guys.

smjjames · « **Reply #107 on:** February 01, 2012, 08:50:58 PM »

Just call it a tie and move them to the next tier, or something.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #108 on:** February 01, 2012, 08:54:19 PM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57558'.

Bla · « **Reply #109 on:** February 02, 2012, 07:32:32 AM »

Ok, this is a really hard fight. Here's my simulation:

* Mudkipz uses mudslap.
* Atomic throws 7, 7, 3 and 2 at Mudkipz.
* Mudkipz parries the deadly incoming numbers with four windowpanes.
* Mudkipz uses strangleskirt.
* Atomic crushes the strangleskirt into atoms.
* Atomic uses atomic bomb.
* Mudkipz uses "nids moar exploshunz".
* Atomic uses atomic bomb.
* Mudkipz uses "nids moar exploshunz".
* Atomic uses hydrogen bomb.
* Mudkipz has left the game.

Looks like Atomic wins.

FiahOwl · « **Reply #110 on:** February 02, 2012, 08:30:12 AM »

This message is only viewable with Universe Sandbox Galaxy Edition. Access it and much more with promo-code '57573'.

Darvince · « **Reply #111 on:** March 15, 2012, 12:14:27 AM »

British kollege young man vs working (at home?) California man

Darvince · « **Reply #112 on:** March 15, 2012, 09:08:13 AM »

This poll nids five more votes to continue.

blotz · « **Reply #113 on:** March 17, 2012, 12:12:51 PM »

baump

Darvince · « **Reply #114 on:** December 13, 2013, 11:59:14 AM »

baump

Poll

Who would win in a fight?

Author Topic: Tournament (Active USForums members) (Read 23973 times)