Welcome, Guest

Author Topic: articles  (Read 70 times)

vh

  • formerly mudkipz
  • *****
  • Posts: 1097
  • crouton inquisition

Darvince

  • *****
  • Posts: 1500
  • "Darv looks like your weird profile picture girls"
Re: articles
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2015, 12:24:46 PM »
a, an, the

FiahOwl

  • *****
  • Posts: 1214
  • لا تقرأ مع الإخلال
Re: Particles
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2015, 12:58:39 PM »
wa

atomic7732

  • Universe Sandbox 1 Beta Team
  • *****
  • Posts: 3360
  • the warmth of life is everywhere
    • PegasiProgramming
Re: articles
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2015, 01:02:26 PM »
cute article

truth and facts don't exist apparently

Bla

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 983
  • The stars died so you can live.
Re: articles
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2015, 01:37:47 PM »
Skepticism is good, but I don't really like how it uses this



It seems to make up an arbitrary example (or how did it ever get that graph?) and then goes on to say
Quote
In practice itís worse than this, because this is assuming everyone is investigating exactly the same question.
I don't really follow this. What if many studies are more like the red curve?



What about the uncertainties that are usually presented by the individual studies themselves? The studies themselves would be curves like that representing each question with uncertainties depending on the method.
But sure some of the things mentioned are legit problems.