i'm a feathery actually
what's your favorite fur type? i prefer fine 10 micron fur
i'm a feathery actually
What furries are classified into subgroups help please
what's your favorite fur type? i prefer fine 10 micron fur
and my birdsona is amazing
Banned for not knowing how to post images
http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php/topic,13213.msg133736.html
>mrw you go around your school asking people about their fetishes okay zirkza
maybe tommorow, i live in asia, so its like 10:49 right now, gtg to sleep
'i'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish today'
All other DNA is Hellpotatoe's Hybrid DNA.?
and almost racistoh my christ not this again
Quoteand almost racistoh my christ not this again
It's not what it looks like! If you want, I can take time out of my schedule to explain, but knowing you that would be a terrible waste of my time.Remember what it looks like is the only thing other people can judge from. People don't have remote access to your thoughts and intentions with what you write - they can only judge from what you write.
I mean, you bigot against all comments that are written by furries, which is a pretty ignorant, and almost racist, thing to do.It simply isn't racist, not even almost, furries aren't a race
It's not what it looks like! If you want, I can take time out of my schedule to explain, but knowing you that would be a terrible waste of my time.Remember what it looks like is the only thing other people can judge from.
There's nothing remotely racist about saying anything about furries. Furries aren't a case.
Jorster made a connection with my posts in the Black People thread. Anyone who views that thread, especially Jorster himself, should know by now that I don't equate race with fandbase anymore.You called something "almost racist" that has nothing to do with race whatsoever, but has something to do with a fanbase, so I don't blame them.
The Furry "Fandom" has grown enough since 1980 to be called a sub-culture, therefore, bigotry such as invalidating furries is not quite, but almost equatable to racism.No, how big a fandom is, some random year, and whether you want to call it a sub-culture, is all irrelevant for whether it's racism or not. If a race isn't involved it's not racism at all. It sounds like you want to compare bigotry to racism and I can see your point there, but racism is a form of bigotry. It may be "almost bigoted" but it's not "almost racism", that's simply false.
Well, furries aren't a race, but they sure do behave like one.Putting aside whether they collectively do behave as a race, whatever that would mean and what evidence there is for that, are you implying that it could make it racist simply because of how furries behave, and not because they belong to a racial group? Or was it just a random comment?
Well, furries aren't a race, but they sure do behave like one.whatever that would mean and what evidence there is for that
That was my questionWell, furries aren't a race, but they sure do behave like one.Putting aside whether they collectively do behave as a race, whatever that would mean and what evidence there is for that, are you implying that it could make it racist simply because of how furries behave, and not because they belong to a racial group? Or was it just a random comment?
And yes
And yesOk, then you're wrong.
Racism consists of both prejudice and discrimination based in social perceptions of biological differences between peoples.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism
But being a homophobe is social discrimination against biological differences, yet not racism.That's because homosexuals aren't a race. It's not a definition of racism but explains what it's concerned with: Biological differencies, more accurately biological differencies that people define as racial.
>less vague definition is still vague definition
Still doesn't help your argument about behavior.
How is homophobia even comparable to someone saying they don't like furries
furry hate has nothing to do with homophobia, they're seperate things.Still doesn't help your argument about behavior.
Never said that it did, and I regret making that point.How is homophobia even comparable to someone saying they don't like furries
It's not, but it can be. Gays are discriminated against because of sexual interests. Furries are discriminated partially because of sexual interests.
I wouldn't say comparable, but it's linked to homophobia.
Let the oxymorony begin
this, just got out of hand
furry has nothing to do with zoophilliathis, just got out of hand
Zoophilia or Masomechanophilia?
sure anyone who has an atypical non-domestic animal as a pet and goes to furry conventions is automatically registered as a beast molester
Is this funny because of the homosexuality stereotype or the scrappy cosplay generalization
(http://static.fjcdn.com/comments/Micahamey+rolled+a+random+image+posted+in+comment+3415981+at+_867c7a7299e4f61fcab24296d844ee2b.jpg)