Universe Sandbox
General Category => Everything Else => Topic started by: Darvince on January 01, 2015, 09:35:31 AM
-
Women's speech is criticized more thoroughly than men's.
-
and in the end no one cares.
-
people should care because it results from
Women's speech is criticized more thoroughly than men's.
-
chauvinist pigs oppress women for not being men, not because they "talk more"
what does your personal text mean
why is that relevant
why not just pm me
-
>as if there's two special groups of men, one oppressive, the other not
-
Yes.
-
oh that makes sense, you've enlightened me so much zirkza. i've never thought that people didn't have varying degrees of misogyny and just simply either hate women or love women.
-
I didn't say there aren't subgroups and, like you said, degrees.
Meanwhile I can't see why people judge minds instead of bodies.
Related:
http://youtu.be/PShA2q0NgiY
-
how is that related
-
is this post sarcastic
-
Meanwhile I can't see why people judge minds instead of bodies.
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? what the hell
-
because the mind is the seat of the soul
-
Women's speech is criticized more thoroughly than men's.
debatable
and in the end no one cares.
clearly darvince did, that's why he made this topic
>as if there's two special groups of men, one oppressive, the other not
it'd be a fuzzy grouping. but then again, anything can be grouped. how do you group the points that make up a line? the split is arbitrary
-
that last post you responded to was sarcasm
sourcey http://www.livescience.com/7420-men-talk-women.html (and yes I read more than just the headline, the article agrees with the title unlike a lot of clickbait)
-
how is that related
Cutting is a result of superficial judgment.
is this post sarcastic
No.
Meanwhile I can't see why people judge minds instead of bodies.
??what the hell
"The boobs don't make the woman"
-Onision
and in the end no one cares.
clearly darvince did, that's why he made this topic
But it's never been a political issue, and most likely never will be.
it'd be a fuzzy grouping. but then again, anything can be grouped. how do you group the points that make up a line? the split is arbitrary
Think of the Sexuality Triangle. There is no specific spilt; it's a gradient.
-
no it's a line you can't "not care about women" unless you're isolated in some all-male habitat
-
That's like saying
no it's a line you can't "not care about god" unless you're isolated in some all-atheist habitat
-
Those two are extremely different. God is not present in our day-to-day lives (unless you want him/it to be), whereas women are.