{"id":3726,"date":"2019-06-20T11:02:44","date_gmt":"2019-06-20T18:02:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/universesandbox.com\/blog\/?p=3726"},"modified":"2019-06-25T11:32:58","modified_gmt":"2019-06-25T18:32:58","slug":"dark-matter-galaxies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/universesandbox.com\/blog\/2019\/06\/dark-matter-galaxies\/","title":{"rendered":"Dark Matter & Galaxies in Universe Sandbox"},"content":{"rendered":"

You may\u00a0notice that our new galaxy model (added in Update 23<\/a>, released on June 25, 2019) no longer includes those bright red dots. The dots were how we represented dark matter in the old galaxy model (pre-Update 23), but we\u2019ve decided not to include dark matter in the new model, for a number of reasons.<\/p>\n

Short\u00a0Explanation<\/h2>\n

Here’s the TL;DR<\/a> explanation of why we removed dark matter in our new galaxy model:<\/p>\n

Dark matter is a theoretical particle proposed to explain the unexpected motion of stars in galaxies. Due to performance constraints, our simplified galaxy dynamics model can\u2019t simulate these complex orbits, so we\u2019ve decided to remove dark matter from our simulations for now.<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re looking for a more in-depth explanation, keep reading!<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nLeft: Spiral galaxy with dark matter (pre-Update 23). Right: Spiral galaxy in Update 23.<\/span><\/p>\n

What is dark matter?<\/h2>\n

No one knows for sure what dark matter is, or even if it exists! But a number of different observations of our universe have revealed stars and galaxies moving under the gravitational influence of more mass than we can see. This hints at the presence of some kind of matter that affects stars and other bodies via gravity, but that can\u2019t be observed directly. This proposed \u201cdark matter\u201d doesn\u2019t produce light, but it also doesn\u2019t block it, or we would be able to see it silhouetted against brighter stars and galaxies in the background (like we can see dust in the Milky Way).<\/p>\n

We don\u2019t know of a type of particle that has mass but that doesn\u2019t interact with light, but a few ideas have been proposed. It may be a new type of particle that we haven\u2019t discovered yet, and several ongoing experiments are trying to directly detect such a particle. Some scientists argue that dark matter does not exist at all, and that the \u201cmissing mass\u201d in astronomical observations simply indicates that our mathematical description of gravity is not yet complete.<\/p>\n

What does this have to do with galaxies?<\/h2>\n

Spiral galaxies were one of the first examples of the missing mass problem. Astronomers discovered the problem while calculating the \u201crotation curve\u201d for these galaxies: a plot of the velocity of a star orbiting in the galaxy, versus the distance of that star to the center of the galaxy. The speed at which an object orbits in space is related to the mass of everything inside its orbit, and the distance to the center of the orbit. In the Solar System, nearly all of the mass inside a planet\u2019s orbit is made up of the mass of the Sun, so the difference in speeds of planet orbits is due mostly to their distance from the Sun. Thus, the rotation curve of planets in the Solar System starts with the high speed of Mercury\u2019s orbit, and then drops off as you move outwards to Venus, Earth, and the rest of the planets.<\/p>\n

But in a galaxy, most of the mass is distributed among the stars that make up the galaxy, so stars farther from the center are orbiting more mass than stars closer in. We can estimate the distribution of mass based on the stars that we see, and predict a slightly more complicated curve: First, the velocities of orbiting stars should increase as you move away from the center, as more and more mass is enclosed by the orbit. But eventually, the extra mass inside the orbit won\u2019t be enough to make up for the increased distance from the center, and the velocities will start to decrease again. The predicted curve has a sort of hump shape, with a long, decreasing tail.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Rotation curve of the galaxy M33. The yellow and blue dots indicate the data, while the dashed line represents the curve you would expect based on the amount of visible mass in the galaxy. Instead, the velocity increases with distance, indicating that more mass is present than we can see. Credit: Mario De Leo<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

But when astronomers actually measure these velocities and create rotation curves of spiral galaxies, the curves don\u2019t drop off with distance. Instead, the velocities get faster and faster as you move outwards, with stars on the outer edges moving so fast that you would expect them to fly off, pulling the galaxy apart. One explanation for this discrepancy is that some kind of unseen mass (\u201cdark matter\u201d) may be present in spiral galaxies, keeping those stars gravitationally bound to the galaxy despite their high speeds.<\/p>\n

Dark matter in Universe Sandbox<\/h2>\n

Since Universe Sandbox is at its core a gravity simulator, we tried to show the influence of dark matter in our previous galaxy model. For a given galaxy, we would calculate the distribution of dark matter that we would expect based on real observations of galaxy rotation curves. Specifically, we used what\u2019s called the Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) profile<\/a>, after the astronomers who identified the distribution. We simulated the dark matter as points of mass scattered through the galaxy, and displayed them as bright red dots (because dark matter is invisible, we wanted to make it clear that we weren\u2019t showing what dark matter \u201creally\u201d looks like!).<\/p>\n

This model would give the \u201cright\u201d distribution of dark matter in a galaxy, but it couldn\u2019t reproduce the most important feature of dark matter in galaxies: the rotation curve. This is because of the way that galaxy simulation works in Universe Sandbox.<\/p>\n

How galaxies are simulated in Universe Sandbox<\/h2>\n

In both the old and the new versions of our galaxy model, we represent the galaxy as a collection of non-attracting particles orbiting a single attracting body, the black hole at the center. Each particle represents a cloud of gas, dust, and stars, which we call a nebula. This means that to our physics engine, the nebulae have zero mass, and the only gravity in the galaxy comes from the black hole.<\/p>\n

But wait, earlier we said that the mass in a galaxy is spread out among all the stars in the galaxy, instead of being concentrated in the center like the Solar System. Why don\u2019t we make all the nebulae into attracting particles? This would certainly make the motion of the galaxy more accurate, but in any gravity simulator, the number of attracting particles significantly affects performance. (You can see this for yourself by opening a simulation with a lot of attracting bodies, like Earth & 50 Moons.) To make galaxies look as good as they do, we need to use hundreds or even thousands of nebulae. A simulation with a thousand attracting particles would run extremely slowly even on a very powerful gaming computer. So instead, we used a simplified model of non-attracting nebulae orbiting an attracting black hole.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In the old version of galaxies, nebulae moved on circular orbits around the black hole, and the initial structure of a galaxy, whether it was a spiral or elliptical, would quickly lose its distinctive shape. In our upgraded version, nebulae are given specific orbits to allow the galaxy to hold its shape over time. The presence of another attracting body besides the black hole will pull the galaxy out of shape. (You can watch this happen in any galaxy collision simulation, or just by adding multiple galaxies to one of your own simulations!) During the development of this upgrade, we realized that adding attracting particles to represent dark matter would make it difficult to maintain the shape of spiral and elliptical galaxies for the same reason.<\/p>\n

Because we are using a simplified galaxy model, we can\u2019t reproduce the galaxy rotation curves we would expect either with or without dark matter. Instead, the rotation curves for our galaxies look more like the Solar System\u2019s: the velocities of the nebulae drop off quickly as you move outwards from the center. Since this model can\u2019t demonstrate the major effect of dark matter in galaxies, we decided to remove it for now.<\/p>\n

We are hoping that a future version of galaxies will use computational methods like Smoothed-Particle Hydrodynamics<\/a> (SPH) that will allow us to simulate hundreds to thousands of attracting nebulae orbiting the galaxy. This even more accurate model will be able to produce realistic galaxy rotation curves, and at that point, we\u2019ll add dark matter back in so users can see its observable effect. In the meantime, we hope you enjoy our improved, interactive galaxy model!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Follow @universesandbox<\/a>