Universe Sandbox

General Category => Everything Else => Topic started by: atomic7732 on March 28, 2013, 12:23:49 PM

Title: Lenin was a lame
Post by: atomic7732 on March 28, 2013, 12:23:49 PM
he was dictatorship

 boo Lenin
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: Hellpotatoe on March 28, 2013, 12:39:42 PM
SHUT UP
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: vh on March 28, 2013, 01:12:28 PM
wait a few seconds please

[move][move][move]LENIN WAS A LAME
LENIN WAS A LAME[/move]
LENIN WAS A LAME[/move]
LENIN WAS A LAME[/move]
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: Yqt1001 on March 28, 2013, 01:16:30 PM
Bla approves this message!

yqt1001: atomic needs re-education! http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php/topic,9377.0.html (http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php/topic,9377.0.html)
Bla: Kol
Bla: He has a point
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: matty406 on March 28, 2013, 02:20:05 PM
wait a few seconds please

[move][move][move]LENIN WAS A LAME
LENIN WAS A LAME[/move]
LENIN WAS A LAME[/move]
LENIN WAS A LAME[/move]

LENIN WAS A LAM LAM LAM LAME LAME LAME
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: atomic7732 on March 28, 2013, 02:23:12 PM
kolkip
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: Bla on March 28, 2013, 02:26:56 PM
Bla approves this message!

yqt1001: atomic needs re-education! http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php/topic,9377.0.html (http://universesandbox.com/forum/index.php/topic,9377.0.html)
Bla: Kol
Bla: He has a point
Well I don't think dictatorship is good or to be prefered, but I don't judge from that as the only factor either. Generally I don't like the common way of classifying countries as simply "good democratic" or "evil dictatorship", as if it's either the people have all the power or one individual or party has all the power and the people has none. I wouldn't say any country is "fully" democratic, for that to happen it would need direct democracy or representation in both legislation and the industry - otherwise the industry cannot be used to satisfy the needs of people and will end up corrupting the legislation. The original soviets were an attempt to solve that problem, but ended up as vassals for the Bolshevik party with people only having limited influence in the lower soviets. Democracy is a continuum, not an either-or.

So no, I'm not a total Lenin-fan who worships him and agrees with him on everything, kol. I don't think I can be categorized as Leninist/Marxist-Leninist, although the Marxist-Leninist parties I have read about in Denmark support democracy and I do consider them as a potential alternative to Enhedslisten if I could get more information about their views on many areas (including Lenin and democracy).

I do share many Marxist-Leninist values though, probably more than with any other "sub-ideology" of communism. And I also find inspiration in some of the things Lenin has written and said. This, for example, I think is positive.
Lenin's speech on anti-Jewish pogroms [Engl. subt.] Lenin juduen kontrako pogromoei buruz (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ljxQsgUM4#)

So do I think Lenin was lame? Overall I'm not sure if I would call him lame.
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: vh on March 28, 2013, 02:40:34 PM
lenin was a plane
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: matty406 on March 28, 2013, 05:11:29 PM
Lenin was a llama
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: FiahOwl on March 28, 2013, 05:28:36 PM
boo Stalinism
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: Darvince on March 29, 2013, 01:15:07 PM
stalein
Title: Re: Lenin was a lame
Post by: blotz on March 30, 2013, 06:10:40 AM
stalIn