(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/76/Paradoc_Interactive.png)
Correction: Paradoxuri.If it does none of those
Also, assuming it gives off heat... Or you could try to touch it. Or it could make tracks.
If it does none of thoseThen it's not a question of whether it exists or not... It can't exist. So no need for proof.
If it does none of thoseThen it's not a question of whether it exists or not... It can't exist. So no need for proof.
This is way different as you do not specify that this teapot is invisible and doesn't give off heat, so I am going to assume it is both visible and gives off heat (which means it has energy and hence can actually exist)If it does none of thoseThen it's not a question of whether it exists or not... It can't exist. So no need for proof.
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time
also i thought you were actually speaking coherently until http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot)