|
Naru523
|
 |
« on: August 10, 2009, 11:38:11 AM » |
|
While fiddling with some buttons, I had an idea. I created the ultimate system. A binary system with two stars that has same masses and diameter. Yes, I also put planets nearby how they occur. Some of them does get flung due to the stars. The stars name are Beta Sun and Alpha Sun.
I did made a trinary system, the system name is HD 188753. The central star is being orbited by a binary, b and c. B is the larger and is a orange type. While the c is a red dwarf.
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 11, 2009, 03:28:40 PM by Naru523 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 03:40:18 PM » |
|
I made a random system highly unstable, 10 star system (can't find file  ), and a cool four star system. Plaxar - 4
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 04:16:55 PM » |
|
Nice 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2009, 04:42:38 PM » |
|
Boring. I did that months ago and did upload the file here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2009, 07:43:35 PM » |
|
A binary system with two stars that has same masses
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2009, 07:50:16 PM » |
|
Yeah, I think he has...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2009, 08:17:12 PM » |
|
He did.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
monmarfori
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2009, 09:13:38 PM » |
|
But... the first star is a high mass star. while a neutron star (the second star) is more massive than the first star's mass.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2009, 02:58:53 AM » |
|
i rule 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
monmarfori
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2009, 03:34:58 AM » |
|
But a neutron star is smaller than a normal star.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2009, 08:47:43 AM » |
|
i rule  You rule in Germany, I rule in Laos, lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2009, 09:14:04 AM » |
|
No buddy, i rule evry where.
You want see interesting binary systems?
Here i upload you 2 of mine. 1.st is two neutrons stars who are the center of the systems and dozens of planets who orbit them
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: August 11, 2009, 09:16:58 AM » |
|
and here we have a binary planetsystem where both have identical mass and around the star Eta Carinae.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Dixon
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2009, 12:35:26 PM » |
|
Boring. I did that months ago and did upload the file here.
i rule  Andreas, Please don't ridicule the accomplishments of others. It makes you seem insecure. You want see interesting binary systems?
Here i upload you 2 of mine. 1.st is two neutrons stars who are the center of the systems and dozens of planets who orbit them
And thanks for sharing. That makes you awesome.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 11, 2009, 12:57:35 PM by Dan Dixon »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andreas
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2009, 01:03:56 PM » |
|
Hey Dan, the neutronstar binary was alot of work, maybe you can put it in Universe Sandbox?
It is a very spectacular system with 2 neutron stars and dozens of planets and it is stable.
and did you see my dwarf galaxy system?
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2009, 03:29:03 PM » |
|
I meant Two stars with masses and diameter but yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atommo999
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: August 15, 2009, 04:27:19 AM » |
|
i found a source showing binary, triple and quadruple star systems and how they orbit each other. http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/orbits.htmli have to say, making a quadruple star stystem on US may prove difficult...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: August 16, 2009, 10:48:12 AM » |
|
Dan did make a system of the second in trinary. I think it's called "The Figure 8" in US?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 16, 2009, 01:45:29 PM by Naru523 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2009, 11:28:34 AM » |
|
Figure 8?
Quadruples are easy, although I purposely didn't make mine stable (see Plaxar file) I posted it in this topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
frankdepinte
 
Posts: 17
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: August 16, 2009, 11:54:26 AM » |
|
Dan did make a system of the second in trinary. I think it's called "The Figure B" in US?
IIRC it was Tony Dunn who provided the Figure 8 Sim . More interesting unusual patterns created with 3 to 4 bodies can be found here : http://www.orbitsimulator.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1181200864/30 , initial data were computed using various internet sources .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Dixon
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2009, 08:34:09 PM » |
|
IIRC it was Tony Dunn who provided the Figure 8 Sim .
Correct. If you click on the Info button after loading the system, it lists Tony with the credit for that simulation. Very awesome. I hadn't seen that thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2009, 08:36:24 PM » |
|
I know this is WAY off-topic, but it kinda is... Dan, from that Very awesome. I hadn't seen that thread.
, I am thinking you go on there. So... do you like my resonance tests and other things? (See page 3, 4, and 5)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Dixon
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: August 17, 2009, 09:13:45 PM » |
|
I know this is WAY off-topic, but it kinda is... Dan, from that Very awesome. I hadn't seen that thread.
, I am thinking you go on there. So... do you like my resonance tests and other things? (See page 3, 4, and 5) Very cool. Feel free to make a new post and link to those threads directly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: August 17, 2009, 09:18:32 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: August 19, 2009, 09:54:28 AM » |
|
Lol?  Anyways, anyone think that quintuple is possible?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: August 19, 2009, 04:12:49 PM » |
|
Yeah, If ternary (3) is quinary (5) is. Senary (6) is too. Castor is a senary. 91 Aquarii is quinary, I made a file for it, but it's unstable and it was total estimation and imagination, as wikipedia didn't give enough info.
Here it is...
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|