Universe SandboxGeneral CategoryEverything ElseTerraforming Mars
Pages: « 1 2
PrintPrint
Author Topic: Terraforming Mars  (Read 2894 times)
qwew80
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 40


« Reply #30 on: September 10, 2009, 11:59:47 AM »

One way we could terra-form Mars is to take gasses from Venus and place them on Mars. That way, we would be terrarorming both Mars and Venus! Grin

Also, witold, how did you make that picture? Huh
Logged
FGFG
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 398



« Reply #31 on: September 11, 2009, 11:14:47 AM »

And I heard that they are trying to terraform mars around 2020?

No, within 2020 is planned the first human landing on Mars
Logged
Bla
Global Moderator

*****
Posts: 765


The stars died so you could live.


WWW
« Reply #32 on: September 11, 2009, 01:26:30 PM »

We shalt Colonize Mars with Our Mighty Technolo...
Oh, wait, am I now starting on this again... *Sigh*
Logged
monmarfori
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 788



« Reply #33 on: September 11, 2009, 01:41:01 PM »

2030?
Logged
hbmp88

*****
Posts: 344


Please visit to help! http://ucallyptis.myminicity


« Reply #34 on: September 12, 2009, 01:09:57 PM »

One way we could terra-form Mars is to take gasses from Venus and place them on Mars. That way, we would be terrarorming both Mars and Venus! Grin

Also, witold, how did you make that picture? Huh

waste of money...

you need to chanmge the atmospheres from within using solar powered machines
Logged
witold

*****
Posts: 130


Sorry for my bad english (if he is)


« Reply #35 on: September 12, 2009, 02:30:47 PM »

Also, witold, how did you make that picture? Huh

Print Screen button  Grin
Logged
FGFG
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 398



« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2009, 04:01:33 PM »

We shalt Colonize Mars with Our Mighty Technolo...
Oh, wait, am I now starting on this again... *Sigh*

It isn't a question of technology knowledge or availability. The problem is money: why the US or whatever government should spend billions to colonize Mars? Which are the advantages?

The first landing on the Moon brought a lot of prestige to the United States because they won the race with the URSS, but now?

Resources? They can't be extracted and brought to Earth cheaply from Mars.

Life? Probes can do it without humans. (Spirit, Opportunity...). And however, after discovering life on other planets, there aren't concrete advantages...

Prestige? Maybe, but not like the landing on the Moon. Why? We already know we can do it...

A more useful colonization would be the Moon one: the Moon can be used as a very efficient vacuum factory and as a launch pad at 0.15 Earth gravity. And it is nearer, so cheaper.

Logged
hbmp88

*****
Posts: 344


Please visit to help! http://ucallyptis.myminicity


« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2009, 07:20:40 PM »

That is why I question the need of an international space staion, when the moon is a more preferable checkpoint.
Logged
Bla
Global Moderator

*****
Posts: 765


The stars died so you could live.


WWW
« Reply #38 on: September 13, 2009, 02:25:37 AM »

We shalt Colonize Mars with Our Mighty Technolo...
Oh, wait, am I now starting on this again... *Sigh*
It isn't a question of technology knowledge or availability. The problem is money: why the US or whatever government should spend billions to colonize Mars? Which are the advantages?

The first landing on the Moon brought a lot of prestige to the United States because they won the race with the URSS, but now?

Resources? They can't be extracted and brought to Earth cheaply from Mars.

Life? Probes can do it without humans. (Spirit, Opportunity...). And however, after discovering life on other planets, there aren't concrete advantages...

Prestige? Maybe, but not like the landing on the Moon. Why? We already know we can do it...

A more useful colonization would be the Moon one: the Moon can be used as a very efficient vacuum factory and as a launch pad at 0.15 Earth gravity. And it is nearer, so cheaper.
But isn't it a question about technology then? Tongue
The ressources can't be extracted and brought to Earth cheaply from Mars - with the current technology.
It costs much money to colonize Mars - with out current technology. Why? Because producing, programming and engineering a spacecraft (and all that stuff) plus sending it (or more than one) to Mars multiple times takes alot of ressources, both from humans and probably also from Earth.
In the future, when our technology is more automatic and robotic, it might be cheaper.
Logged
FGFG
Beta Team

*****
Posts: 398



« Reply #39 on: September 15, 2009, 09:31:34 AM »

It's obvious that now it is too much expensive and that in the future will be cheaper...
Logged
Bla
Global Moderator

*****
Posts: 765


The stars died so you could live.


WWW
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2009, 10:32:35 AM »

Yes, and that's what I'm pointing out. It is about technology. Smiley

Technology makes most things cheaper. Smiley
Logged
Darvince

*****
Posts: 865


Nuedarfarevar


« Reply #41 on: March 14, 2011, 03:08:27 PM »

Technology = 1 = 3 = 5 = Reds = 1A = 17 = 9 = 4 = Lilacs = 88 = 12 = 7 = 5 = Universe = 95

Uh what.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2
PrintPrint
Jump to: