|
atomic7732
|
 |
« Reply #1470 on: January 22, 2011, 10:28:31 AM » |
|
and they didn't end the alliance either.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
deoxy99
|
|
« Reply #1471 on: January 22, 2011, 11:28:01 AM » |
|
Yay.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1472 on: January 22, 2011, 01:08:17 PM » |
|
Naru523 may spend 5 + 61 + 0 + 105 / 5 = 87,0 = 87 resources.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darvince
|
|
« Reply #1473 on: January 22, 2011, 01:10:04 PM » |
|
[hax sign]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1474 on: January 22, 2011, 01:20:23 PM » |
|
Now get awff my islands.
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1475 on: January 22, 2011, 01:24:14 PM » |
|
Darvince may spend 5 + 105 + 15 + 0 / 5 = 125,0 = 125 resources.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1476 on: January 22, 2011, 01:25:09 PM » |
|
Questions for conquering a city. If you conquer one which is a level two or more, can you conquer it in one turn? Or destroy one each turn?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1477 on: January 22, 2011, 01:26:13 PM » |
|
You'll conquer it and keep the first level. You can conquer a city at any level, the level in the top will just be destroyed each time it's conquered.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darvince
|
|
« Reply #1478 on: January 22, 2011, 01:28:48 PM » |
|
i requsted a trade in r17, didn't I? or did i not
alsho can i haz peace wif west bloc pl0x
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1479 on: January 22, 2011, 01:30:10 PM » |
|
I remember you saying that a trade wif NeutronStar was imminent, but then he said it was commonent... And I can't find commonent in my dictionary, so officially, the trade has nawt been accepted yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darvince
|
|
« Reply #1480 on: January 22, 2011, 01:30:39 PM » |
|
he ashepted
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1481 on: January 22, 2011, 01:30:57 PM » |
|
i requsted a trade in r17, didn't I? or did i not
alsho can i haz peace wif west bloc pl0x
then you'd have peace wif me then. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darvince
|
|
« Reply #1482 on: January 22, 2011, 01:31:45 PM » |
|
okies next turn.1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1483 on: January 22, 2011, 01:33:11 PM » |
|
I predict another war in R20-25.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1484 on: January 22, 2011, 01:33:59 PM » |
|
I don't know what commonent means... And didn't NeutronStar say it was a made up word? I need him to confirm the trade request, if you can't quote one. Also, we're the marginal bloc now.  I suggest that you join us. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1485 on: January 22, 2011, 01:35:03 PM » |
|
I don't know what commonent means... And didn't NeutronStar say it was a made up word? I need him to confirm the trade request, if you can't quote one. Also, we're the marginal bloc now. I suggest that you join us. I joinz! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darvince
|
|
« Reply #1486 on: January 22, 2011, 01:35:29 PM » |
|
.
yay marginal bloc joint
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1487 on: January 22, 2011, 01:38:38 PM » |
|
Also, Darvince, you can have peace with us if you join the marginal bloc and ally us.  So, what do you say? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1488 on: January 22, 2011, 01:49:22 PM » |
|
Hey Nue, I pwopose a zone trading treaty for my zone below the defensive zone in Australia for your zone left to mines in your continent.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
|
« Reply #1489 on: January 22, 2011, 03:15:52 PM » |
|
Ummm me and Darv are at war with you... so no...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1490 on: January 22, 2011, 03:18:51 PM » |
|
Darvince made peace with us, no? i requsted a trade in r17, didn't I? or did i not
alsho can i haz peace wif west bloc pl0x
then you'd have peace wif me then. okies next turn.1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
|
« Reply #1491 on: January 22, 2011, 03:22:07 PM » |
|
wesht... Not easht.
well I'm confuzzled. Fix this nao.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1492 on: January 22, 2011, 03:22:54 PM » |
|
It is either the whole of our Great Marginal Empire or none! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Darvince
|
|
« Reply #1493 on: January 22, 2011, 03:23:21 PM » |
|
u wil die nue
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1494 on: January 22, 2011, 03:23:44 PM » |
|
Shhhi. wesht... Not easht.
well I'm confuzzled. Fix this nao.
Including me. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1495 on: January 22, 2011, 03:28:28 PM » |
|
I am alsho confuzzled. I want diplomacy to work better than this. This system fails.
I HEREBY DEKLARE A NEW DIPLOMACY SYSTEM FOR GAME 4 AND ON. From now on, alliances must choose a LEADER (by default the most productive nation). Instead of all nations jumping around diplomatically by making peace and declaring war all the time, the leader declares war/requests/accepts peace on behalf of all the members in the alliansh.
The leader of an alliance can also arrange trade routes between members of the alliance without having them to request... Or should we make another feature, trade unions, for that? The problem would probably just be that if trade unions worked seperately from alliances, the leader of a trade union might make trades between nations at war, which may not be realistic and not very good either.
...Or should it be implemented now?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
|
« Reply #1496 on: January 22, 2011, 03:32:06 PM » |
|
NAO
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Naru523
|
|
« Reply #1497 on: January 22, 2011, 03:35:33 PM » |
|
Whatever is best, I'll get along with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bla
|
|
« Reply #1498 on: January 22, 2011, 03:36:45 PM » |
|
Bla starts a poll! Bla votes NAO. Bla closes the poll. NAO wins with one vote! It was close though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
atomic7732
|
|
« Reply #1499 on: January 22, 2011, 03:37:56 PM » |
|
I voted too. duh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
General Category
Print
